Monday, November 06, 2006

The Azeri Question in Iran:

The Azeri Question in Iran
A Crucial Issue for Irans Future
by Nasib Nasibzade

Nasib Nasibzade is the President of the Foundation for Azerbaijan Studies in Baku, Azerbaijan. He was Azerbaijans Ambassador to Iran from 1992-94.
Iran is a multinational country, composed of Persians, Azeris, Kurds, Turkmens, Arabs, Baluchies and others. The Turkic speaking Azeris in Iran are being discriminated against by the Iranian regime. This problem is further exxareggated by the fact that, the Azeris are themselves a divided nation, separated by the borders of Iran and the Azerbaijani republic. These two circumstances have combined to pose an Azeri dilemma.

The History of the Problem

In the early nineteenth century the Russian Empire occupied the Khanates of North Azerbaijan, which were de jure a part of Qajar, Iran, but de facto were independent. Despite the close relations between North and South Azerbaijan until the 1930s, these two parts of Azerbaijan have historically developed in seperate ways: the division occurred at a time when national self-consciousness amongst Azeri�s was not strong enough. It played an essential role in creating distinctions between South and North Azerbaijan.

The inclusion of North Azerbaijan into the Russian Empire�and consequently the cultural differences between Russians and Azeris�played a significant role in the appearance of self-awareness of Azeris. These differences have been expressed in language, religion, mentality, customs and historical roots. On the other hand, Northern Azerbaijan had been turned into a Russian colony in terms of tight control over its fiscal systems, exploitation of oil and other natural resources. Because of the fear of religious and ethnic affinity with the Ottoman Turks, Russia established special rule over North Azerbaijan, including repression of any sign of national movements. Despite this repression, the national movement in North Azerbaijan began earlier than in South Azerbaijan. The national movement in North Azerbaijan went through three evolutionary stages:

1.Demand for cultural autonomy (1905-1917).

2.Demand for national-territorial autonomy (1917-1918).

3.Struggle for national independence (since 1918).

Consequently, the creation of the independent Azerbaijan Democratic Republic in 1918, in Northern Azerbaijan formally symbolized the existence of Azeris as a separate nation. During this period in South Azerbaijan several factors combined to ensure that a different course of events would transpire. The historical past, religious unity in terms of Shiism, cultural closeness, historical traditions of Persian language and literature, and other related factors between Azeris and Persians slowed the development of the Azeri national movement in Iran. At the same time, the permanent threat from Russia (Tsarist and Soviet) was an important factor that influenced Azeris to put aside their national aspirations. For this reason, when Russian aggression against Iran at the end of the 19th and early 20th Centuries grew in its intensity, the main theorists of Pan-Iranism appeared to be of Persian as well as of Azeri origin, such as Kasravi, Kazemzade, and Rezazade.

It is important to point here that for a long time during the Qajar and Pahlavi monarchies in Iran, and even in the present Islamic regime, there were and continue to be many ethnic Azeris, who carried substantial weight with the Iranian government. Those who joined the Iranian elite were tempted by the desire to have their social and economic needs met by the regime.

Azerbaijan in the Administrative and Demographic Structure

South Azerbaijan consists of Ardabil, East Azerbaijan, West Azerbaijan, Zenjan, Hamadan ostans (provinces), and the adjacent areas of Astara, Gazvin, and other ethnic territories. The size of these territories is estimated at approximately 170,000 sq. km. (the territory of North Azerbaijan is approximately 86,600 sq. km or roughly half of the total area). Turks te by ethnic composition in the Azerbaijani provinces of Iran (more than 90% of the total population).

It is difficult to determine the exact number of Azeris in Iran. Official statistics are not published detailing Iran�s ethnic structure. According to our research, official statistics indicate that the Azeris make up nearly 40% of the total population of Iran. This is 75% of all Azeris in the world.

Despite less territory and a smaller population, North Azerbaijan (Republic of Azerbaijan) is the political, ideological and cultural center of the Azeri nation. However, the country�s difficult geopolitical position has forced Azerbaijan to look for allies in and out of the region. South Azerbaijan can be potentially the most faithful and strongest ally in the foreseeable future. The notion of a United Azerbaijan is very popular in the Azerbaijan Republic.

Cultural Discrimination Policy

Persian chauvinism in Iran has hurt significantly the economic and social well-being of South Azerbaijan. Chauvinism as a policy has been practised implicitly by the Iranian regime and has targeted at its core the national culture of Azeri�s in South Azerbaijan. The Azeri language had been removed from official use in all areas, including, schools, courts, government structures, and the army. Specific forms of Azeri cultural expression are prohibited as well.

In the last parliamentary elections, Mr. Chehregani, who ran on a platform of observing the 15th article of the constitution (that is on, using local languages for literature lessons in elementary schools), was elected in the first round of voting from Tabriz. His victory ended in a police interrogation, his and finally in arrest in Tehran.

National-Liberation Movement

The national-liberation movement of South Azerbaijan has a history going back 90 years. National-territorial autonomy demands were put before Iranian rulers during various movements�led by Sattarhan (1908-1909), Hiyabani (1920), Pishevari (1945-1946), Shariat-Madari (1979-1980). In their demands, they outlined various ways to resolve the pressing issues of nationality questions in Iran.

There are at least two factors that influence the current situation of the Azeri national movement in Iran:

1.The rise of Azeri national consciousness and diffusion of the national movement into a higher social strata.

2.The restoration of independent Azerbaijani statehood in the north.

Amongst Azeris in Iran there are three main viewpoints for dealing with the national problem of South Azerbaijan:

1.A group made up of religious, industrialists and bureaucratic, personalities who occupy a prominent position in the Iranian state, and their ideologists support the idea of a united Iran (�national iranocentrists�). They strive to increase the share of authority and capital within a single Iran. They support the notion of Turkisation of Iran. This group supports the idea of the unification of Iran with North Azerbaijan.

2. A group of intellectuals, industrialists and bureaucrats who fear the division of Iran and support the idea of granting South Azerbaijan (at the same time to other ethnic-national minorities) cultural or national-territorial autonomy, which is regarded by them as the optimal way of resolving the Azerbaijan problem. �Democracy to Iran, autonomy to Azerbaijan� is a very popular idea amongst this interest group.

3.The third group is represented by new political organizations and groups, which support the independence of South Azerbaijan and the idea of a United Azerbaijan . The appearance of these organizations signals the beginings of a new stage in developments related to the question of Azerbaijan in Iran. Those elements that are radical within these groups do not believe that the ethnic question in Iran can be resolved in an evolutionary manner. They believe that in order to achieve their national goals they should use all means possible, including military means if neccessary.

The Iranian Government�������s Position

Any ethno-national issue in multi-ethnic Iran is one of the most important factors affecting the future of the country. Choosing the current form of government and its support is closely connected with the multinational structure of Iran. The ideology of Pan-Iranism was hurt by the collapse of Shah�s regime. Islam, as the centralizing ideology, became the main factor and brought the different nations together.

The problem of non-Persian national minorities in Iran coincides with the problem of divided nations as well. The Iranian leadership deals with these problems by trying to involve representatives of ethnic groups and national minorities into government structures, but they do not make any concessions in the fields of language, culture or self-governance.

The sudden emergence of the independent Azerbaijan state in the North has caused many problems for the Iranian leadership. The mere existence of Azerbaijan Republic, above all, has had an important influence and impact on the national movement in Iranian Azerbaijan.

The overall conclusion is that the future of Iranian statehood itself could be problematic. Part of the Iranian leadership, especially high-level politicians of Azeri origin, support inclusion of the �ancient Iranian land,� i.e., the Azerbaijan Republic into Iran. Most of the Iranian leadership, however, rejects such idea as unrealistic and undesirable. In their opinion, an increase in the Azeri elements in Iran and the politicization of the Azeri population will cause additional concern for Persian nationalism.

Therefore, the current Iranian regime tries to bring the Azerbaijan Republic into its political sphere of influence in an effort to eliminate the influence of the Azerbaijan Republic on the Azeri population of Iran. In so doing, Iran is demonstrating the following political interests:

1. To prevent the formation of a truly independent and prosperous Azerbaijan Republic and minimize its influence in South Azerbaijan, in order to insure the territorial integrity and internal stability of Iran.

2. To prevent the increase of US and Turkish influence in Azerbaijan and Central Asia.

3. To prevent integration of the Turkic world.

4. To gain strongholds in order to influence the Muslims of the Caucasus, Central Asia, and the Russian Volga region.

5. To have free access to Azerbaijan�s market and natural resources.

6. In accordance with the official �export of Islamic revolution� doctrine, to create an Islamic, pro-Iranian regime in Azerbaijan.

Recently, there has been intensified ideological activity in Iran on the Azerbaijan question. The active propaganda on the �absence� of ethnic unity in both North and South Azerbaijan, the increased ideological struggle against Turkism and the Turkic world by official propaganda, the ignorance of existence of independent Azerbaijan by the people are all characteristic features of the official policy of Tehran. In addition, repressive measures and the police regime toward the Azeri activists in Iran have also been increasing.


The resolution of ethnic problems in Iran, including the Azeri problem, is closely related with democratization in Iran. In the near future and in the next political crisis in Iran, these ethnic issues will be on the agenda. It should be noted that this topic played a role in the last presidential elections as well. The extent and intensity of the Azeri question, that is, cultural autonomy, national-territorial autonomy or the demands for full independence will depend on the influence and integrity of ethnic forces, the extent of support for national ideals and finally, foreign factors.

Sunday, November 05, 2006

why should Azarbeijan secede and become independent?

Yaashaasoon Azarbaijan
Or why should Azarbeijan secede and become independent?

June 8, 2006

No, I am not a zealot Azari being offended by Soosk cartoon. I am a full-blooded, if there is such a thing, Persian also laughing at C. Elmira’s diatribe. Which is exactly why I advocate the secessation of Azarbaijan.

Our Iran has been under the yoke of the Turks for the past 900 years. We have suffered innumerous defeats against the Turks. They have been ruling brutally all these years. The only non-Turkic rulers in the past 900 years were Karim Khane Zand and the the Pahlavis. Turks have penetrated most of the Iranian society. More than half of active army and police are Turks. Simply because they are hard-working smart people. Hats off to them.

Nevertheless, Turks are NOT Iranian. We were enemies in the Pre-Islamic era. Powerful Iranian armies kept them at bay during all this time. Only after the power vacuum created by the Arab invasion, did the Turks could move westward. It is interesting to note that Babak, the Azari National Hero, was tricked and captured by a Turkic Prince Afshin!

The Site of the Tabriz University had once hosted a long essay by Ahmad Kasravi, an Azari himself but proud Iranian nonetheless, vividly describing how Turkic tribes moved westward and settled in Azarbaijan and through years of fighting between these tribes, the local Iranian population dwindled and became Turkic. I haven’t been able to locate the article again. It should be a must-read for all Iranians.

Whether today’s Azaris are Turks or just Turkish speaking, one thing has become clear in all these years: They are conquerors of our land and never part of it. Anybody interested in more details should refer to books by Mir Fetroos or simply read the history books more carefully. Review the Safavid dynasty, check Nader Shah. The Ghajars are really beyond the pale! They lost a huge portions of the country and couldn’t care less.

I can’t recall where I read the story of the Russian’s capturing and annexing vast swathes of land north of Khorasan. The ruling Ghajar wasn’t bothered. He wrote to his mother: The Ghajars have enough for their horses and sheep herds (naghle be mazmoon)! He was the ruler of an occupied country. This wasn’t his homeland, he simply didn’t give a d**n.

Isn’t it bizarre, to say the least, that the very same people who have been oppressing Iranians now claim being oppressed?! Dear Azaris, you have occupied and been running this country for the past 900 years. You have destroyed our heritage, and now we are the oppressors??!! Has anyone ever wondered why the Iranians are so distrustful of each other? Except the Azaris? My theory: divide and rule. The Turks being the rulers divided the masses of Iranian stock.

Now it is time that we each go our separate ways. Borders are not sacred. Human lives are. I love Iran, but shedding blood doesn’t keep it together or prosperous. Without the Turks, we the Aryan Iranians, Kurds, Baluchis, Persians etc, could start rebuilding our nation and our pride after 1400 years of humiliation and destruction. And may the Azaris be prosperous and happy too in their newly independent Republic of Azabaijan or whatever it shall be called. A smaller but free country is a much better alternative to a larger one but under foreign occupation.

In that spirit: Yaahaasoon Azarbaijan!